Process Performance Statement (Table 1.1)
Amount Strategic Measure/
Process
Value Sales $40,000 Less: Raw Materials 9,000 Less: Understand markets/customers 280 Revenue per customer $4 $5 ---- 1.3 $5,700 Develop vision and strategy 110 Shareholder value +2% +5% ---- 2.1 800 Design products and services Research& Development 600 Average revenue/patent $11,240 $15,000 ---- 1.1 250 Introduce new product/service 250 Revenue/new product $10,040$15,000 ----- 1.3 200 Refine existing products/services 400 Target cost achievement 88% 98% ---- 1.4 32,000 Market and Sell Market products 860 Revenue per lead $0.1 $0.15 ---- 2.0 750 Sell products/services to relevant 1,250 % contacts sold
45% 60% 3.8 weeks 0.8
18,000 Process customer orders 320 Accurate& on-time 92% 100% 5.5days 2.4 Produce/deliver (manufacturing/service org) Procure materials 1,500 Target time/quality/price 84% 100% 25 days 2.3 Convert resources/inputs into
18,300 Target time/quality/price 74% 100% 14.4 days 1.5
1,400 Deliver products 380 Target time/quality/price 88%100% 5 days 2.6 Invoice and service customers Bill the customer 220 On time payment 82% 98% 35 days 2.0 Provide after-sales service 150 $ per existing customer $1.5 $1.0 ---- 2.5 Respond to customer inquiries 90 $ per existing customer $0.9 $0.3 ---- 0.8 Develop and manage human resources Manage deployment of personnel 240 Average length employment 5.2 years 10 years ---- 1.7 Develop and train employees 150 Improvement rate 4% 10% ---- 2.3 Ensure employee well-being
120 Employee turnover
7.5% 2.0% ----
2.2 Manage information resources Manage information storage/retrieval 480 Targeted service level 62% 100% ---- 1.4 Manage facilities/network operations 310 Targeted service level 87% 100% ---- 1.9 Facilitate info sharing/communication 290 Targeted service level 93% 100% ---- 2.1Manage financial and physical resources Process finance/accounting
490 $ per sales invoice
$1.30 $0.75 ---- 2.1 Develop budget 260 Financial estimate accuracy 93% 100% ---- 1.4 Conduct internal audits 140 Significant audit exceptions 3 0 ---- 2.0 Manage the tax function
150 Effective tax rate
27% 30% ---- 2.1 Execute environmental management 100 Targeted
environmental
1.4 (1,000) Manage external relationships 90 Cost of capital 1.9 500 Manage improvement and change 130 Improvement rate ---- 1.3 Net Profit $3,340
Events have a sequence certain
events precede and other events follow. Each activity (work step) requites
certain input before it can begin and a certain output before it can allow
the next step to start. To illustrate the dependence amongst events,
consider a procurement business process (Figure 1.1).
The process map portrays the sequence of events in a procurement process
(Figure 1.1). The process is executed every
time a purchase order is placed an event that takes place dozens of times in
a single day. If you were to plot the procurement process on a time phased
graph (see Figure 1.2), each time a purchase order was placed, you could
project when all upcoming activities in the procurement process are
anticipated to occur. During any month, you would find each purchase order
in a different state of completion depending on when the process was
initiated. Of even more interest, you could statistically predict how much
work was to be accomplished during the upcoming month. The necessity for the
upcoming activities has already been set in motion by earlier events the
placing of a purchase order. Predictability does not depend first and
foremost on forecasting rather it depends on an understanding of the
sequence of events (Figure 1.2) and the statistical probability of the
resulting financial impact.
Resource
consumption standards The resource
consumption standards are based on the average amount of resources consumed in
processing one unit of output. Every activity has finite time duration and
requires a finite expenditure of resources. An activity cost should include all
traceable that is, where a cause and effect relationship can be established
resources and shared services. Table 1.1 illustrates a resource activity
standard.
Each primary activity must be assessed to determine its process variation.
First, the assessment should compute the actual amount of process variation.
Second, the work group should determine the root cause problems that explain why
a process varies. Third, management must act on the information. Minimizing cost
variation is an important goal of predictive accounting. There is a direct
correlation between cost variation and process variation. The first step is to determine the amount of process variation. Process
variation identifies the gap between the current process performance and its
potential performance. The gap indicates the value creation potential of each
process. For instance, assume a sales order taking process currently is capable
of entering 150,000 orders per year. However, by eliminating all the root cause
problems, the potential capacity could increase to 250,000 orders per year. This
gap of 100,000 orders per year represents a tremendous opportunity for
productivity improvement. One simple technique to rapidly approximate the amount of process variation
is called the ideal process method. The method begins with the actual average
activity time derived from the resource consumption standard. The work group
then determines how long it takes to perform the activity when there are no
problems the activity is completed without a hitch. This value is labeled the
ideal activity time. The ideal activity time is determined by observation or it
originates from the experience of the work group. It is unnecessary to perform a
more rigorous analysis to set the ideal time since the purpose of this method is
to compute a quick and approximate estimate of process variation. This method is
summarized below: Process Variation = Standard activity time ; Ideal activity time But before accountants are ready to embrace predictive accounting, they want
to ensure the projected results are based on facts and "hard" numbers.
Accountants do not like subjectivity. They avoid, when possible, external
forecasts and projections. Predictive accounting must meet the immutable
criteria of objectivity and verifiability. It does! Predictive accounting relies on hard facts derived from process
mapping. It relies on the hard facts that underlie statistical analysis.
Consider that predictive accounting use some of the most interesting of these
"hard" facts to project future financial performance: The four "hard facts" stated above form the touchstone of the predictive
accounting revolution. Consider the implications. If there is a set sequence to
processes and its component activities are repeatable, then the results of a
process are predictable within statistical limits. The constant attention to and
improvement of the factors that cause process variation will improve the
statistical probability of achieving the predicted performance results. Root
cause analysis simplifies the process by identifying the significant few
problems that need to be fixed. As the problems are resolved over time,
management reaps twofold benefits: First, performance improves. Second,
management will become more confident in using process data to predict future
performance results. Summary Under predictive accounting, the accounting profession is poised to take one
of its most significant leaps forward by increasing the relevancy of reported
financial information. Accounting information will focus on managing upcoming
events rather than merely reporting past history. Predictive accounting becomes even more provocative when one considers that
it is built from existing proven process techniques such as standard costing,
Six Sigma, control charts, activity based cost and balanced scorecards. What
predictive accounting adds to these tools is a foundation that integrates these
elements into a process framework. Of chief impetus is the convergence of
process knowledge and information technology that has enabled management to
advance the process model. A process framework creates a powerful synergy by
joining these potent but independent techniques. Predictive accounting meets the
important criteria of any accounting system, it is relevant and reliable. To be
relevant, the accounting should have predictive value, feedback value, and be
timely. Clearly predictive accounting exceeds historical accounting based on
these criteria. To be reliable, the system must be verifiable, valid and
objective. Predictive accounting is at least as reliable as historical
accounting systems since it uses the same general ledger and operational data. Phone: 972.980.7407 email:
assistyou@valuecreationgroup.com |
copyright 1984-2013 Contact Us | For additional information, click